+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 9B vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base leads with 12.5% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Mistral Small 3 24B Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B was created as a more compact open-source model, designed to deliver capable performance with reduced computational requirements. Built with 9 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it serves applications where efficiency and accessibility are valued alongside the benefits of open-source availability.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Base was developed as a 24-billion-parameter foundation model, designed to serve as a base for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide a strong starting point for domain-specific applications, it represents an intermediate-scale option in Mistral's model lineup.
7 months newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:61.0%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Average Score:73.5%(+12.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:61.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Avg Score:73.5%(+12.5%)
Providers:0