+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 9B vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 15.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B was created as a more compact open-source model, designed to deliver capable performance with reduced computational requirements. Built with 9 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it serves applications where efficiency and accessibility are valued alongside the benefits of open-source availability.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 MoE was created using a mixture-of-experts architecture, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency through sparse activation. Built to combine the benefits of larger models with practical computational requirements, it represents Microsoft's exploration of efficient scaling techniques.
1 month newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:65.4%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:80.5%(+15.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:65.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:80.5%(+15.1%)
Providers:0