+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads with 25.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B was created as a more compact open-source model, designed to deliver capable performance with reduced computational requirements. Built with 9 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it serves applications where efficiency and accessibility are valued alongside the benefits of open-source availability.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
2 months newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:56.3%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:81.2%(+25.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:56.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:81.2%(+25.0%)
Providers:0