+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 235B A22B leads with 26.6% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 235B A22B is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen3 235B A22B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B was created as a more compact open-source model, designed to deliver capable performance with reduced computational requirements. Built with 9 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it serves applications where efficiency and accessibility are valued alongside the benefits of open-source availability.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B was developed as a large-scale model with 235 billion total parameters using a mixture-of-experts architecture activating 22 billion parameters. Built to provide frontier capabilities with computational efficiency through sparse activation, it represents Qwen's advancement into very large-scale model development.
10 months newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:57.2%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Average Score:83.9%(+26.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
4 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:57.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Avg Score:83.9%(+26.6%)
Providers:4