+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 2 9B leads with 15.4% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Gemma 2 9B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B is a language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (88.0%), BoolQ (84.2%), HellaSwag (81.9%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (93.8%), AIME 2024 (81.4%), LiveBench (74.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Gemma 2 9B
2024-06-27
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Average Score:41.4%(+15.4%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:25.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
3 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 2 9B
Avg Score:41.4%(+15.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:25.9%
Providers:3