+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 3 1B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 28.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
Launched on the same date
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:58.3%(+28.4%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:29.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:58.3%(+28.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:29.9%
Providers:0