+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 3.0% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B represents the largest variant in the Gemma 3 family, developed to provide flagship-level open-source capabilities. Built with advanced training methodologies and 27 billion parameters, it offers researchers and developers access to powerful language understanding without proprietary restrictions.
Launched on the same date
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.15 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:62.5%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:65.4%(+3.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:62.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:65.4%(+3.0%)
Providers:2