+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 17.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3 12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental version optimized for LiteRT deployment, designed to push the boundaries of on-device AI. Built to demonstrate the potential of running instruction-tuned models on mobile and edge devices, it represents ongoing efforts to make AI more accessible across hardware platforms.
2 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 10 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:55.6%(+17.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Average Score:37.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:55.6%(+17.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Avg Score:37.8%
Providers:0