+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 3n E4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 32.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3 12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:85.7%(+32.8%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:52.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:85.7%(+32.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:52.9%
Providers:0