+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 8.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 198.1K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Gemma 3 12B is $59.85 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemma 3 12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($59.85 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:52.3%(+8.1%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:44.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:52.3%(+8.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:44.2%
Providers:1