+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs GPT-4.1 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 2.5% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano offers 818.2K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 12B. Both models have similar pricing. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.35 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:64.9%(+2.5%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:62.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:64.9%(+2.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:62.4%
Providers:1