+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs GPT-5 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 nano leads with 30.3% higher average benchmark score. GPT-5 nano offers 265.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 12B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, GPT-5 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Nano was developed as the most compact variant in the GPT-5 family, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments and edge computing scenarios. Built to bring next-generation AI capabilities to devices and applications where latency and efficiency are paramount, it distills GPT-5 innovations into a minimal footprint.
4 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.30 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:40.9%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Average Score:71.2%(+30.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 nano
2024-05-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:40.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Avg Score:71.2%(+30.3%)
Providers:2