+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs GPT OSS 120B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 120B leads with 39.2% higher average benchmark score. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 120B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 120B was developed as an open-source model release from OpenAI, designed to provide the research and developer community with access to a capable language model. Built with 120 billion parameters, it enables experimentation, fine-tuning, and deployment in contexts where open-source licensing and transparency are valued.
4 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.39 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.45
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:40.9%
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Average Score:80.1%(+39.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:40.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 120B
Avg Score:80.1%(+39.2%)
Providers:5