+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 20.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:88.6%(+20.8%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:67.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:88.6%(+20.8%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:67.8%
Providers:0