+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 6.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 126.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Gemma 3 12B is $11.85 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
7 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($11.85 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:71.6%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:77.9%(+6.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:71.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:77.9%(+6.4%)
Providers:1