+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Grok-3 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 49.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 126.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-3 Mini. Gemma 3 12B is $0.65 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
23 days newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.65 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:32.8%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:82.2%(+49.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:82.2%(+49.5%)
Providers:1