+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Grok-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 50.5% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 offers 1.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 12B. Gemma 3 12B is $17.85 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 represents the fourth generation of xAI's language models, developed to continue advancing the frontier of AI reasoning and knowledge. Built to handle increasingly complex tasks with enhanced reliability, it demonstrates xAI's commitment to pushing AI capabilities forward.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($17.85 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:32.8%
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:83.3%(+50.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:32.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:83.3%(+50.5%)
Providers:2