+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Grok 4 Fast
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok 4 Fast leads with 63.0% higher average benchmark score. Grok 4 Fast offers 1.8M more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 12B. Gemma 3 12B is $0.55 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok 4 Fast is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Fast is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.0% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in SimpleQA (95.0%), HMMT 2025 (93.3%), AIME 2025 (92.0%). With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Grok 4 Fast
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.55 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:23.9%
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
Average Score:86.9%(+63.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:23.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok 4 Fast
Avg Score:86.9%(+63.0%)
Providers:1