+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Kimi K2 Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 21.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (94.4%), IFEval (88.9%), DocVQA (87.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.2% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in C-Eval (92.5%), GSM8k (92.1%), MMLU-redux-2.0 (90.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 34 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:47.8%(+21.3%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:26.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:47.8%(+21.3%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:26.5%
Providers:0