+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Kimi K2 Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 15.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B is $2.72 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
4 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($2.72 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:62.8%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:77.9%(+15.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:62.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:77.9%(+15.2%)
Providers:1