Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 28.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemma 3 12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3 12B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (94.4%), IFEval (88.9%), DocVQA (87.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AI2D (91.1%), DocVQA (88.4%), ChartQA (83.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 6 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemma 3 12B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 32 common benchmarks
Gemma 3 12B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemma 3 12B
DeepInfra
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Gemma 3 12B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Gemma 3 12B
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova
Together