+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 3.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
3 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.25 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:71.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:75.4%(+3.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:71.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:75.4%(+3.5%)
Providers:9