Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 30.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemma 3 12B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3 12B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (94.4%), IFEval (88.9%), DocVQA (87.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemma 3 12B
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
Gemma 3 12B
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemma 3 12B
DeepInfra
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Gemma 3 12B
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Gemma 3 12B
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together