+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 10.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.7M more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 12B. Gemma 3 12B is $0.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Maverick is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick was developed as a variant in Meta's fourth-generation language model family, designed to explore specialized capabilities and training approaches. Built to push the boundaries of open-source model development, it represents experimentation with advanced techniques in the Llama lineage.
24 days newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.62 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Input:$0.17
Output:$0.60
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:63.7%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Average Score:73.8%(+10.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:63.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Maverick
Avg Score:73.8%(+10.2%)
Providers:7