+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Mistral Large 2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Large 2 leads with 2.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral Large 2. Gemma 3 12B is $7.85 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2 was introduced as the second generation of Mistral's flagship model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities across diverse language tasks. Built with enhanced reasoning, coding, and multilingual abilities, it represents Mistral's most advanced offering for enterprise and demanding applications.
7 months newer
Mistral Large 2
Mistral AI
2024-07-24
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($7.85 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:89.9%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Average Score:92.5%(+2.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:89.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Avg Score:92.5%(+2.6%)
Providers:2