+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 1.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 198.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
1 month newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.06 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:71.9%(+1.9%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:70.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:71.9%(+1.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:70.0%
Providers:2