+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct leads with 4.5% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:62.7%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:67.1%(+4.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:62.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:67.1%(+4.5%)
Providers:0