+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 leads with 23.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 77.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.8%), IFEval (90.3%), AIME 2025 (72.1%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
NVIDIA
2025-08-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:51.5%
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Average Score:75.1%(+23.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
2024-09
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:51.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Avg Score:75.1%(+23.7%)
Providers:0