+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs o1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 19.2% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 37.9K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 12B. Gemma 3 12B is $74.85 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1 was developed as part of OpenAI's reasoning-focused model series, designed to spend more time thinking before responding. Built to excel at complex reasoning tasks in science, coding, and mathematics, it employs extended internal reasoning processes to solve harder problems than traditional language models through careful step-by-step analysis.
2 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($74.85 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:62.2%
+
+
+
+
o1
Average Score:81.3%(+19.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
o1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:62.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1
Avg Score:81.3%(+19.2%)
Providers:2