+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs o1-preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-preview leads with 23.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 101.4K more tokens in context window than o1-preview. Gemma 3 12B is $74.85 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1-preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-preview was introduced as an early version of OpenAI's reasoning model series, designed to demonstrate the potential of AI models that engage in extended thinking before responding. Built to solve complex problems through deliberate reasoning processes, it represented an initial step toward more thoughtful and analytical AI systems.
6 months newer
o1-preview
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($74.85 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Input:$15.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:43.7%
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Average Score:67.1%(+23.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:43.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1-preview
Avg Score:67.1%(+23.4%)
Providers:2