+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 12B leads with 3.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 122.9K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.45 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:69.0%(+3.5%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Average Score:65.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:69.0%(+3.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Avg Score:65.5%
Providers:1