+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct leads with 12.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 7B was developed as an efficient vision-language model, designed to provide multimodal understanding with minimal computational requirements. Built with 7 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it serves applications requiring practical vision-language capabilities with constrained resources.
1 month newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:71.7%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Average Score:83.7%(+12.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:71.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Avg Score:83.7%(+12.1%)
Providers:0