+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 235B A22B leads with 9.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 235B A22B. Both models have similar pricing. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Qwen3 235B A22B is available on 4 providers. Overall, Qwen3 235B A22B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B was developed as a large-scale model with 235 billion total parameters using a mixture-of-experts architecture activating 22 billion parameters. Built to provide frontier capabilities with computational efficiency through sparse activation, it represents Qwen's advancement into very large-scale model development.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($0.05 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.10
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:62.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Average Score:72.3%(+9.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:62.9%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Avg Score:72.3%(+9.4%)
Providers:4