+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 12B vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
QwQ-32B leads with 19.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, QwQ-32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B was developed as a reasoning-focused model, designed to emphasize analytical thinking and problem-solving capabilities. Built with 32 billion parameters optimized for step-by-step reasoning, it demonstrates Qwen's exploration into models that prioritize deliberate analytical processing.
7 days newer
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:51.5%
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:70.8%(+19.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:51.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:70.8%(+19.4%)
Providers:0