+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 44.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs. Gemma 3 27B is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (80.2%), GSM8k (62.8%), Natural2Code (56.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Launched on the same date
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:20.7%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:65.4%(+44.8%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
2 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:20.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:65.4%(+44.8%)
Providers:2