+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Gemma 3 4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 4B leads with 19.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B was developed as a compact yet capable open-source model, designed to strike a balance between performance and resource efficiency. Built with 4 billion parameters and instruction tuning, it provides a practical option for applications requiring moderate capability with manageable computational costs.
Launched on the same date
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3 4B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:29.9%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Average Score:49.4%(+19.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3 4B
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:29.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 4B
Avg Score:49.4%(+19.5%)
Providers:1