+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed leads with 14.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 9 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:22.2%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:37.1%(+14.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:22.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:37.1%(+14.9%)
Providers:0