+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Gemma 3n E4B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B leads with 6.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (80.2%), GSM8k (62.8%), Natural2Code (56.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Average performance across 28 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:19.2%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:25.4%(+6.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:19.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:25.4%(+6.2%)
Providers:0