+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed leads with 8.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (80.2%), GSM8k (62.8%), Natural2Code (56.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. Notable strengths include HumanEval (75.0%), MGSM (67.0%), MMLU (64.9%). The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 27 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:19.9%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:28.0%(+8.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:19.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:28.0%(+8.1%)
Providers:1