+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo leads with 11.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-3.5 Turbo is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
1 year newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:36.2%
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:47.3%(+11.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:36.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:47.3%(+11.1%)
Providers:2