+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs GPT-4.1 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 nano leads with 12.7% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GPT-4.1 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:49.7%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:62.4%(+12.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:49.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:62.4%(+12.7%)
Providers:1