+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview leads with 5.7% higher average benchmark score. Overall, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (80.2%), GSM8k (62.8%), Natural2Code (56.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is a language model developed by IBM. The model shows competitive results across 12 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AttaQ (86.1%), HumanEval (82.4%), HumanEval+ (78.3%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents IBM's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:20.7%
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:26.3%(+5.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:20.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:26.3%(+5.7%)
Providers:0