+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 43.1% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
7 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:30.9%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:74.0%(+43.1%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
1 providers
xAI
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:30.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:74.0%(+43.1%)
Providers:1