+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Grok-4 Heavy
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 Heavy leads with 73.3% higher average benchmark score. Grok-4 Heavy supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Grok-4 Heavy is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 Heavy was created as a larger, more capable variant of Grok 4, designed to provide maximum reasoning depth and analytical capability. Built for the most demanding applications requiring sophisticated problem-solving, it represents xAI's flagship offering in the fourth generation.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Grok-4 Heavy
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:10.5%
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Average Score:83.9%(+73.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4 Heavy
2024-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:10.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-4 Heavy
Avg Score:83.9%(+73.3%)
Providers:0