+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 leads with 27.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
6 days newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:44.9%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:72.7%(+27.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:44.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:72.7%(+27.8%)
Providers:0