+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 32.7% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
24 days newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:23.8%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:56.5%(+32.7%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
6 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:23.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:56.5%(+32.7%)
Providers:6