+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 1B leads with 10.1% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3 1B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (80.2%), GSM8k (62.8%), Natural2Code (56.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. The model shows competitive results across 6 benchmarks. Notable strengths include AIME 2024 (73.6%), GPQA (70.8%), AIME 2025 (64.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:24.5%(+10.1%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:14.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:24.5%(+10.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:14.3%
Providers:0