+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Small 2506 leads with 49.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Magistral Small 2506 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small was created as an efficient reasoning-focused variant, designed to bring analytical capabilities to applications with tighter resource constraints. Built to balance problem-solving depth with practical deployment needs, it extends reasoning-enhanced AI to broader use cases.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:10.5%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:59.7%(+49.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:10.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:59.7%(+49.2%)
Providers:0