+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 1B leads with 14.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3 1B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (80.2%), GSM8k (62.8%), Natural2Code (56.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small 2506 is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.2% across 4 benchmarks. Notable strengths include AIME 2024 (70.7%), GPQA (68.2%), AIME 2025 (62.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:26.9%(+14.3%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:12.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:26.9%(+14.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:12.6%
Providers:0