+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct leads with 30.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (80.2%), GSM8k (62.8%), Natural2Code (56.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. The model shows competitive results across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (86.2%), ARC-C (84.6%), RULER (84.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 42 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:12.8%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Average Score:43.3%(+30.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
1 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:12.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Avg Score:43.3%(+30.5%)
Providers:1