+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 28.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 MoE was created using a mixture-of-experts architecture, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency through sparse activation. Built to combine the benefits of larger models with practical computational requirements, it represents Microsoft's exploration of efficient scaling techniques.
6 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 7 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:37.2%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:65.8%(+28.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:37.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:65.8%(+28.6%)
Providers:0