+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 35.6% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (80.2%), GSM8k (62.8%), Natural2Code (56.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Average performance across 42 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:12.8%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:48.4%(+35.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:12.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:48.4%(+35.6%)
Providers:0