+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3 1B vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini leads with 23.4% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Phi 4 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
1 month newer
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:36.8%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:60.2%(+23.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:36.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:60.2%(+23.4%)
Providers:0